Duration Of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Does Not Affect In-stent Restenosis Rates After Carotid Artery Stenting
Christine Jokisch, Chetan Dargan, Haroon Janjua, Roy Wesley Jones, Neil Moudgill, James D. Brooks.
University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
OBJECTIVES:
There are few data available to support the use of dual antiplatelet therapy in carotid artery stenting (CAS), and most clinical evidence is derived from studies involving coronary interventions. As a result, the appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after CAS has yet to be determined. We aimed to elucidate whether the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy played a role in the rate of carotid in-stent restenosis.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent CAS at our institution over a 20-year period (1996-2016) was performed (n=279). Patients who did not complete their follow-up duplex studies or were not discharged on clopidogrel were excluded from the study. Patients were separated into short-term (<6 weeks, n=159) and long-term (>6 weeks, n=112) clopidogrel users based on duration of therapy. We defined clinically significant in-stent restenosis as >50% restenosis (PSV = 224 cm/s) in symptomatic patients and >80% restenosis (PSV = 325 cm/s) in asymptomatic patients status-post prior CAS based on published velocity criteria. Rates of in-stent restenosis at 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year intervals were analyzed between the two groups using chi-squared analysis.
RESULTS:
Demographic information was largely similar between the two groups; however, short-term clopidogrel users were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation (9.43% vs. 1.68%, p=0.008) and were less likely to have a history of CABG (16.35% vs. 29.41%, p=0.009), diabetes (33.34% vs. 49.58%, p=0.006) and CAD (50.31% vs. 63.03%, p=0.035). All patients were on long-term aspirin therapy. There was no significant difference between overall rates of in-stent restenosis between the short-term and long-term clopidogrel users (5.03% vs. 9.24%, p=0.168) within 5 years of the index procedure. Similar results were observed when these groups were evaluated at 1-year (5.61 % vs. 3%, p=0.321), 2-year (2.02% vs. 6.59%, p=0.072), and 5-year (2.24% vs. 3.57%, p=0.635) follow-up.
CONCLUSION:
No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of in-stent restenosis after CAS between short-term and long-term clopidogrel therapy. Patients in whom there is no other indication for longer duration clopidogrel therapy may be considered for shorter duration course of dual antiplatelet therapy following CAS.
Back to 2020 Karmody Posters