SCVS Main Site  |  2021 Virtual Portal  |  Past & Future Symposia
Society For Clinical Vascular Surgery

Back to 2022 ePosters


Comparison Of External Iliac Artery To Common Femoral Artery Surgical Access For Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Justin M. George1, Christopher Hatzis1, Lukas Ritzer1, Nicole Ilonzo2, Peter V. Cooke1, Sahil Khera1, Gilbert H. Tang1, Annapoorna S. Kini1, Peter L. Faries1, Rami O. Tadros1.
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA, 2Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Objective: Many patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) have concomitant peripheral arterial disease and require surgical access. The objective of this study is to compare preoperative medical and radiographic risk factors, procedural characteristics, and postoperative outcomes between common femoral artery and external iliac artery surgical access in TAVR patients.
Methods: A single center prospectively maintained TAVR database was analyzed for all patients undergoing surgical cutdown from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020. All patients had preoperative imaging to evaluate access sites. Data on demographics, risk factors, preoperative imaging, procedural characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Selection of cutdown site was made by the vascular surgeon.
Results: 130 TAVR patients had surgical cutdowns. 82 were femoral and 48 were iliac artery. There was no significant difference between femoral and iliac artery groups in age(80.0±8.0 vs 81.1±;p=0.38), BMI, or medical risk factors. 100% of procedures in both groups were successful. Mean femoral artery size was smaller in the iliac access group(7.0±2.1mm vs. 5.1±1.4mm;p<0.001), mean sheath-to-femoral artery ratio was lower in the femoral group(0.91±0.34 vs 1.2±0.44;p<0.001) and there was higher incidence of circumferential femoral artery calcium in the iliac access group(17% vs 50%;p<0.001). There was no difference in iliac diameter(7.8±1.8mm vs 7.9±1.5mm;p=0.89) or circumferential iliac calcium(16%vs13%;p=0.80) between groups. There was no significant difference in adjunct procedures in femoral vs iliac access. There was a trend toward increased unplanned endarterectomy in the femoral access group(19% vs 6%;p=0.06). There was no difference in significant hemoglobin decrease, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, hematoma, lymph leak, stroke, major adverse limb event, discharge to home vs rehabilitation facility, or 30-day reoperation rate in femoral vs iliac access. There was a higher incidence of 30-day readmission in the femoral access group(12% vs 2%;p=0.05). (Table 1)
Conclusion: External iliac artery surgical access is associated with decreased rates of unanticipated endarterectomy with no increased complication rate. The external iliac artery is an appropriate access site for large bore arterial access in select patients such as those with smaller femoral arteries, high sheath-to-femoral artery ratios, and circumferential femoral artery calcium.
Table 1-Femoral vs Iliac Artery Access for TAVR

Access Location
Femoral Iliac
N = 82N = 48p value
Demographic DataGender, Male %55500.72
Race, %
White74690.55
Black6100.50
Other20211.00
Age, years (SD)81.1 (8.5)80.0 (8.0)0.38
Body Mass Index (SD)26.7 (5.2)28.0 (6.0)0.20
Comorbidities, %
Hypertension96981.00
Diabetes Mellitus40500.36
Congestive Heart Failure52580.59
COPD27350.33
Coronary Artery Disease89960.21
End-Stage Renal Disease11101.00
Peripheral Artery Disease67750.43
Current/Prior Tobacco Use73810.39
Prior Femoral Cutdown, %12170.60
Prior Femoral Percutaneous Access, %71650.56
Operative CharacteristicsElective Procedure, %991001.00
Procedure Completed, %1001001.00
Successful Device Implementation, %1001001.00
Sheath:Femoral Artery Ratio0.91 (0.34)1.2 (0.44)<0.001
General Anesthesia, %1001001.00
Adjuncts During Index Procedure, %
Angioplasty of Iliac Artery11190.29
Stenting of Iliac Artery661.00
Lithotripsy of Iliac Artery050.13
Unplanned Endarterectomy1960.06
Operative OutcomesRates of Perioperative Complications, %
Hemoglobin Drop >3, %18150.64
Intraoperative Transfusion, %12190.32
Postoperative Transfusion, %11170.42
Postoperative Hematoma, %560.71
Postoperative Lymph Leak, %001.00
Postoperative Stroke, %580.47
Major Adverse Limb Events, %221.00
30 Day Reoperative Rate, %200.53
30 Day Readmission Rate, %1220.05
30 Day Mortality Rate, %541.00
Length of Stay, days (SD)4.4 (3.8)4.4 (4.0)0.93
Disposition, %
Home76771.00
Subacute Rehab21211.00
Death During Index Hospital Stay421.00
Vascular Anatomy AnalysisDiameter Femoral Artery, mm (SD)7.0 (2.1)5.1 (1.4)<.001
Femoral Artery Calcification Extent, %
Circumferential, %1750<.001
Anterior, %300.53
Posterior, %54400.15
Iliac Artery Diameter, mm (SD)7.8 (1.8)7.9 (1.5)0.89
Iliac Artery Calcification Extent, %
Circumferential, %16130.80
Anterior, %16130.80
Posterior, %12101.00


Back to 2022 ePosters