Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery

SCVS Home SCVS Home Past & Future Symposia Past & Future Symposia

Back to 2024 Abstracts


Gait Parameters after Non-traumatic Minor and Major Amputations: A Comparative Analysis for Functional Limb Salvage
Holly Shan, BS1, Christian Lava, MS1, Rajan Negassa, BS1, Kishan Shah, BS1, Umayr Shaikh, MPH1, Parker Buck, MS1, Christopher Ply, BS1, Cameron Akbari, MD1, John Steinberg, DPM1, Jayson Atves, DPM1, Linda Harris, MD2.
1Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA, 2University of Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA.

OBJECTIVES:The surgical decision for limb salvage with ray amputation (RA), transmetatarsal amputation (TMA), and below-knee amputation (BKA) for complex lower extremity (LE) wound hinges on several factors, including patient choice and ambulatory function. Several studies assessing postoperative outcomes following limb salvage for chronic LE wounds. However, gait as a measure of functionality to compare levels of amputation remains understudied. We aim to compare functional outcomes of partial RA, TMA, and BKA patients through gait analysis.
METHODS:Between December 2021 to -July 2023, patients aged 18 years or older, who could safely ambulate unassisted without pain, open wounds, or LE surgery within past three months were invited to participate. Patients with partial RA, TMA, or BKA were included in analysis. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative characteristics, and amputation details were collected. Levels of amputation were verified through radiographic review. Participants completed a standardized gait analysis protocol with wearable sensors, completing a 120-second walk test at a self-selected pace and a 30-second Romberg (sway) test. Data was collected via Motility Lab software. Data was analyzed utilizing ANOVA, significance defined as p<0.05.
RESULTS:Of the 368 patients in the gait database, 67 received a qualifying amputation: RA (n=38, 56.7%), TMA (n=14, 20.9%), and BKA (n=15, 22.4%). BKA patients were younger than RA and TMA patients (55.78.6 vs. 66.110.3 vs. 64.612.3 years; p=0.008), but had comparable BMIs and CCIs. There were no differences in gait parameters across all amputation levels, including gait speed, elevation mid-swing, step duration, cadence, single and double limb support, and sway. However, gait parameters were worse across all cohorts compared to normal values reported in existing literature.
CONCLUSIONS:
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to use gait as a measure of functionality to compare levels of amputation. Despite the perception of altered gait mechanics in patients undergoing RA, TMA, or BKA, we found no significant differences in gait disturbances between these groups. These findings could represent patient-centered functionally based surgical management for limb salvage using interdisciplinary care, preoperative medical optimization, and proper patient selection. Further studies with a greater number of patients are crucial for comparing limb salvage interventions.


Back to 2024 Abstracts