Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery

SCVS Home SCVS Home Past & Future Symposia Past & Future Symposia


Facebook   Instagram   Twitter   Youtube

Back to 2025 Display Posters


Distal Extent Of Dissection Increases Risk Of Malperfusion Syndromes And Need For Reoperation In Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
Michelle N. Manesh, MD1, Helen A. Potter, MD2, Alexander D. Dibartolomeo, MD1, Li Ding, MD, PhD1, Sukgu M. Han, MD, MS1, Alyssa Pyun, MD1, Niema Pahlevan, PhD1, Gregory A. Magee, MD1.
1University Of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Objectives: There is limited data on the impact of distal extent of dissection (DoD) in patients with acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). We aimed to evaluate the impact of DoD on malperfusion syndromes, reintervention, and mortality in patients undergoing TEVAR for aTBAD. Methods: The SVS VQI registry was queried from 2012-2022 for patients undergoing TEVAR for aTBAD. Primary exposure variable was DoD, categorized as thoracic (zones 2-5), abdominal (zones 6-9) or iliac (zones 10-11). Primary outcomes were malperfusion on presentation (renal, mesenteric, lower extremity [LE]) and mortality after TEVAR. Secondary outcomes were reoperation and resolution of malperfusion after TEVAR. Three-way logistic regression models were created to evaluate resolution of malperfusion after TEVAR based on DoD (DoD was inlcluded as the independent variable by which the rates of preoperative and postoperative malperfusion were compared in each patient). Multivariable logistic regression was performed for 30-day and 2-year mortality. Results: Of 2,455 included patients, DoD was relatively evenly distributed between thoracic (32%), abdominal (26%), and iliac (42%) regions. A more DoD was associated with a stepwise increase in intestinal (5% vs. 14% vs. 20%, p<.0001), renal (7% vs. 18% vs. 27%, p<.0001), and LE malperfusion (6% vs. 9% vs. 27%, p<.0001) on presentation. DoD was associated with reoperation (11% vs. 15% vs. 17%, p=.0017), and residual intestinal (2% vs. 5% vs. 6%, p=0009) and renal (3% vs. 5.5% vs. 6%, p=0.0036) malperfusion after TEVAR. DoD was also associated with higher rates of resolution of renal, intestinal and LE malperfusion after TEVAR (p<.0001 for all). On multivariable analysis, DoD was not associated with mortality (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions: DoD is not independently associated with mortality, but is associated with need for reoperation and residual intestinal and renal malperfusion after TEVAR. However, DoD is also associated with increased likelihood of resolution of malperfusion after TEVAR. These finding suggest that flow dynamics in aTBAD are dependent on DoD and may fluctuate soon after TEVAR.

Table 1. Outcomes associated with distal extent of dissection in patients with aTBAD undergoing TEVAR
Total (n=2455)Thoracic (n=779)Abdominal (n=634)Iliac (n=1042)p-value
Preoperative Malperfusion
Intestinal ischemia332 (13.5%)40 (5.1%)86 (13.6%)206 (19.8%)<0.0001
Renal ischemia448 (18.3%)52 (6.7%)112 (17.7%)284 (27.3%)<0.0001
Leg ischemia385 (15.7%)45 (5.8%)55 (8.7%)285 (27.4%)<0.0001
Postoperative malperfusion
Intestinal ischemia112 (4.6%)19 (2.4%)29 (4.6%)64 (6.1%)0.0009
Renal ischemia118 (4.8%)21 (2.7%)35 (5.5%)62 (6.0%)0.0036
Leg ischemia58 (2.4%)13 (1.7%)13 (2.1%)32 (3.1%)0.1253
Re-operation361 (14.8%)87 (11.3%)95 (15.0%)179 (17.3%)0.0017
For Aorta/branch153 (6.5%)41 (5.5%)45 (7.4%)67 (6.8%)0.3513
For Rupture4 (0.2%)1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)0.99
For Aortic enlargement5 (0.2%)2 (0.3%)2 (0.3%)1 (0.1%)0.62
For False lumen patency12 (0.5%)4 (0.6%)3 (0.5%)5 (0.5%)0.99
For Extension of dissection19 (0.9%)5 (0.7%)6 (1.0%)8 (0.9%)0.7964
For Malperfusion51 (2.3%)6 (0.8%)16 (2.7%)29 (3.1%)0.0052
For Device factors9 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)5 (0.9%)4 (0.4%)0.03
For Bleeding5 (0.2%)3 (0.4%)1 (0.2%)1 (0.1%)0.46
For Other reason33 (1.5%)12 (1.7%)8 (1.4%)13 (1.4%)0.8942
30-day mortality193 (7.9%)51 (6.5%)58 (9.1%)84 (8.1%)0.1859


Back to 2025 Display Posters